<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offline Task Handling Application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.drakengren.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.drakengren.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/</link>
	<description>The place for me to turn abstract stuff into concrete (!).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 13:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Drakengren</title>
		<link>http://blog.drakengren.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Drakengren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptualintegrity.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/#comment-32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha, you might have a point there! But you forgot to include the messiness of your &quot;next action&quot; lists, your reference filing system, and not to forget, the project support files. Of course, you just move the chaos there. *But*, then the general entropy has been refactored into those different categories, so the complexity actually decreases somewhat.

So, if you start with less-than-infinite entropy, there&#039;s some margin for improvement.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, you might have a point there! But you forgot to include the messiness of your &#8220;next action&#8221; lists, your reference filing system, and not to forget, the project support files. Of course, you just move the chaos there. *But*, then the general entropy has been refactored into those different categories, so the complexity actually decreases somewhat.</p>
<p>So, if you start with less-than-infinite entropy, there&#8217;s some margin for improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pontus Gagge</title>
		<link>http://blog.drakengren.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pontus Gagge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptualintegrity.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I had to postpone answering that question...

The messiness of your desk is inversely proportional to the organization of your mental state (I desperately hope!).
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I had to postpone answering that question&#8230;</p>
<p>The messiness of your desk is inversely proportional to the organization of your mental state (I desperately hope!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Drakengren</title>
		<link>http://blog.drakengren.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Drakengren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptualintegrity.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not *into* that stuff, I&#039;m just using it! :-)
And whether you keep your tasks on paper or in some task handling application, it&#039;s good to have some structure on it.
But don&#039;t underestimate the psychologically nice properties of the GTD &quot;next actions&quot;! But perhaps you&#039;ve never had a problem with procrastination? ;-)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not *into* that stuff, I&#8217;m just using it! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And whether you keep your tasks on paper or in some task handling application, it&#8217;s good to have some structure on it.<br />
But don&#8217;t underestimate the psychologically nice properties of the GTD &#8220;next actions&#8221;! But perhaps you&#8217;ve never had a problem with procrastination? <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pontus Gagge</title>
		<link>http://blog.drakengren.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pontus Gagge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptualintegrity.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/offline-task-handling-application/#comment-29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GTD, time management, personal efficiency -- I didn&#039;t know you were into that stuff! Who needs to be efficient...?

Actually, I&#039;ve run across GTD: there&#039;s also a freeware Lotus Notes template which I think does the same thing.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Information_Management/Personal_Information_Managers/Getting_Things_Done__GTD__for_Lotus_Notes.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Information_Management/Personal_Information_Managers/Getting_Things_Done__GTD__for_Lotus_Notes.html&lt;/a&gt;
After all, Notes/Domino  has rather more impressive antecedents in the offline capable groupware space, even if the Exchange server line has been cleaned up extensively, and the N/D implementation is too monolithic for effective information integration. Hence IBM&#039;s emphasis on Workplace in the long term...

Haven&#039;t tried it very much myself -- I tend to prefer the PDA form factor. On which I have yet to see a truly usable todo-list.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GTD, time management, personal efficiency &#8212; I didn&#8217;t know you were into that stuff! Who needs to be efficient&#8230;?</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;ve run across GTD: there&#8217;s also a freeware Lotus Notes template which I think does the same thing.  <a href="http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Information_Management/Personal_Information_Managers/Getting_Things_Done__GTD__for_Lotus_Notes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Information_Management/Personal_Information_Managers/Getting_Things_Done__GTD__for_Lotus_Notes.html</a><br />
After all, Notes/Domino  has rather more impressive antecedents in the offline capable groupware space, even if the Exchange server line has been cleaned up extensively, and the N/D implementation is too monolithic for effective information integration. Hence IBM&#8217;s emphasis on Workplace in the long term&#8230;</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t tried it very much myself &#8212; I tend to prefer the PDA form factor. On which I have yet to see a truly usable todo-list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

